Minutes of the
regular meeting of the Georgetown Township Planning Commission, held Wednesday,
November 1, 2006
Meeting called to order by
Chairman Honderd at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Honderd, Pearson, Poskey, DeGood, South,
Stasiak, Huizinga
Absent: none
#061101-01 - Agenda for November 1, 2006
Moved by
Poskey, seconded by South, to approve the agenda for November 1, 2006, as
presented.
MOTION
CARRIED.
#061101-02 - Minutes of
the October 18, 2006 regular
meeting
Moved by Stasiak, seconded by DeGood, to approve the
minutes of the October 18, 2006 meeting,
as submitted.
MOTION
CARRIED.
#061101-03 - Unfinished Business Preliminary Plat of Crosswinds
The
zoning administrator presented a review as follows. No new information or plans have been
submitted. The request was left tabled
at the last meeting.
SUMMARY
At
the September 6, 2006 meeting the item was tabled and the following issues
remained:
·
Township Board
denied dry sewer at the September 25, 2006 meeting; therefore, the plat can not
be approved as presented since Chapter 24 footnote (d) states that lots not
served by sanitary sewer (or dry sewer) shall have a minimum size of 13,300
square feet and a minimum width of 95 feet.
The plan as presented does not meet these ordinance requirements.
·
Fire Dept. issues
remained, including: the 8 inch water main located on the west side of Berens
Lane would have to be located on the east side per Township Water Department
specifications; fire hydrant placements were designated; the proposed street
with the name of Brzezinski Ct. should be renamed because Ottawa County Road
Commission specifications state that named roads utilizing the word “Court” are
for permanent dead-end roads.
·
The Planning
Commission directed that a stub street be provided to the property at the
northwest of the site to provide interior access and limit access on 48th
Ave. and Baldwin.
·
At the October 4,
2006 meeting, the applicants indicated that there were discussions with the
Director of the DPW Department regarding the installation of dry sewer. Since the Board denied the dry sewer, the
Board would have to take action to approve any location of dry sewer and at
this point it has not happened.
The
zoning administrator stated that the issue of dry sewer for the plat would have
to be reversed by the Township Board in order for dry sewer to be installed
since the Board already denied the request.
The consensus of the Planning Commission was to leave the item tabled to
give the applicant time to work out the remaining issues.
#061101-04 - Rezoning (REZ0607) To
change from (HDR) High Density Residential to (LDR) Low
Density
Residential a parcel of land described as P.P. # 70-14-26-300-004, located at
1245 Parsons, Georgetown Township, Ottawa County, Michigan.
The
zoning administrator presented a review as follows.
SUMMARY
The
Township Board initiated the rezoning of 1245 Parsons from HDR to LDR at the
October 9, 2006 meeting for the reasons that it was in the best interest of the
Township and the property owner since the property was adjacent to other single
family homes and a single family home currently exists on the property, and
single family homes were not permitted in the HDR district.
The
request has been evaluated according to the three C’s as follows:
1.
Consistency: is the proposed zoning and all of its permitted uses consistent
with the recommendations of the township land use plan?
The proposed zoning designation and all of its
permitted uses are consistent with the land use plan. The Future Land Use Map designates this
property as LDR and the site is adjacent to LDR property to the east. A single family home currently exits on the
property.
2. Compatibility: is the
proposed district and all of its allowed uses compatible with the surrounding
area?
The proposed zoning designation and all of its
permitted uses are compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed district (LDR) allows the following
permitted uses: detached single family dwellings, parks, family daycare homes,
adult foster care family homes, foster family homes and state licensed
residential family facilities. Special
uses include: Churches, municipal buildings, public utilities, group daycare
homes, private non-commercial recreation, golf courses, non-commercial schools,
cemeteries, commercial soil removal, bed and breakfast establishments, daycare
centers, commercial wireless communication towers and adult foster care
homes. To the east are single family
homes and lots in the LDR district. To the north and west the property is zoned HDR and is
part of the Glen Eagle development. To
the south the property is zoned RR; however, the parcels were split years ago
(inconsistent with the size requirements in the Zoning Ordinance for RR lots)
into small sized lots where single family homes exist.
3. Capability: is the property
capable of being used for a use permitted within the existing zoning district?
The property is capable of
being used for the uses permitted in the LDR district. Water is available to be brought to the site;
however, sewer is not available on Parsons.
The Zoning Ordinance states that lots in the LDR district not serviced
by public water and sanitary sewer shall be a minimum of 13,300 square feet in
area and 95 feet wide. This parcel
exceeds those minimum requirements.
4. Other considerations: will
the rezoning require an inordinate expenditure of public funds (road
improvements, utility extension, etc.) to make the development feasible?
No public funds would be
required.
5. Will the rezoning cause
development to “leap frog” other undeveloped areas in the same zoning district
and necessitate premature extensions of services to rural areas of the
township?
The property and
surrounding property is already developed.
Single family homes already exit on the subject property, as well as the
property to the south and east. To the
north and west the property is already developed into condos.
6. Is there sufficient vacant
land already zoned in a specific category (e.g., industrial, multifamily,
commercial)?
Although there is amply land already zoned LDR,
this rezoning will continue the LDR district to the west.
The
chairman opened the public hearing.
Harold
Bolt, 1239 Gleneagle Trail, asked what “leap frog” meant.
Honderd
explained that the Township looked to see that zoning districts were contiguous
or were buffered such as a commercial district adjacent to a higher density
residential district, which would in turn be a buffer for a lower density
residential district.
Loren
Bolhuis, 1245 Parsons, said that they were the property owners and they wanted
to split the property to construct another single family home. They asked if the split would be approved.
The
zoning administrator explained that a Land Split application and fee would have
to be submitted to the Township, along with a survey that showed dimensions of
the existing structures to the proposed property lines. She said that all elements would have to meet
the requirements of the ordinance in order for the split to be approved and
that was not a part of this application.
Karen
Bolhuis, 1245 Parsons, asked when the property had been zoned HDR.
The
zoning administrator said that she had sent them a copy of an assessing card
that noted that the property was zoned HDR in 1973; therefore, it would have
had to have been zoned HDR sometime prior to that time, but no records were
available at the Township Office.
Tom
Sjoerdsma, 5963 Gleneagle Trail, asked if there would be an access through this
property to the Gleneagle development.
Honderd
said that to have changes to the Gleneagle Planned Unit Development, the owners
would have to go through the whole PUD process.
Loren
Bolhuis said that he had no intention of using his property to access the
Gleneagle Developent.
The
chairman closed the public hearing.
A
letter from Geneviere Pickett, 1353 Gleneagle Pl., was read.
Moved
by Poskey, seconded by DeGood, to recommend to the Township Board to approve
Rezoning (REZ0607)
To change from (HDR) High Density Residential to (LDR) Low Density Residential
a parcel of land described as P.P. # 70-14-26-300-004, located at 1245 Parsons,
Georgetown Township, Ottawa County, Michigan, based on the findings that the
LDR zoning district is consistent with the Master Plan and Future Land Use Map,
compatible with the surrounding area and the property is capable of sustaining
the uses allowed in the LDR district.
MOTION CARRIED.
#061101-05 – Other Business
Nancy
Hoekstra, 5960 Gleneagle Dr., asked about the closing of the Gleneagle Golf
Course.
The
zoning administrator explained that Gleneagle had been developed as a Planned
Unit Development and a site plan had been approved for the site. She said that if the site is to be changed
from the approved plan, the property owners would have to go through the whole
approval process again and that would include the publishing of a notice and
sending property notices.
#061101-06 – Adjournment
The
chairman adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m.