Minutes of the regular meeting of the Georgetown Township Planning Commission, held Wednesday, July 18, 2007

 

Meeting called to order by Chairman Honderd at 7:30 p.m.

 

Present:            Honderd, Poskey, South, Pearson, Huizinga, DeGood, Stasiak

Absent: none

 

#070718-01 - Agenda for July 18, 2007

 

Moved by Pearson, seconded by DeGood, to approve the agenda for July 18, 2007 as presented.

 

MOTION CARRIED.

 

#070718-02 - Minutes of the June 20, 2007 regular meeting 

 

Moved by Stasiak, seconded by DeGood, to approve the minutes of the June 20, 2007 regular meeting, as submitted.

 

MOTION CARRIED.

 

#070718-03 – Site Plan (ST0706) Unity Christian Schools-5900 48th Ave. (site plan 1, site plan 2)

 

David Wilcons, GMB Architects, and Jack Postema, Unity Christian High School principal, represented the applicant and presented the request. 

 

The zoning administrator presented a review as follows.

REQUEST

The request is to construct an additional parking lot with 392 parking spaces on a site that currently contains athletic fields and 322 parking spaces.  The applicant plans to construct a school building in the future.  At the February 23, 2000 meeting (see the minutes after the review), the ZBA approved variances from the requirements of special use standard in Sec. 20.4(U)(3) to permit the athletic fields to be located within 200 feet from property lines abutting a residential district with conditions as follows: 

 

1.      That landscaping, similar to that applied to practice fields (B), be added between the full width of the tennis courts (A) and adjoining property line to the north; the full width of the baseball competition field (D) and adjoining property lines to the north and east; and the full width of the softball competition field (F) and adjoining property line to the east.

2.      That no additional seating or bleachers be permitted within the two hundred (200) foot setback areas.

3.      That no outdoor lighting be located within two hundred (200) feet of any property line, and that all lighting, if added, be directed away from adjacent properties.  Further, if lighting is added, that said lighting be subject to Planning Commission site plan review and approval; and

4.      That the approved variances apply only to the footprints and uses of Items A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I, as shown on the site plan dated received and signed by the Township on 2/2/2000.  Said variances not extending to any other portion of the site, of facility or use thereon.

 

At the March 15, 2000 meeting (see the minutes after the review), the Planning Commission recommended that the Township Board approve the special use permit for a K to 12 school and approved the site plan.  At the March 27, 2000 meeting (see the minutes after the review), the Township Board approved the special use permit.

 

The sign shown on the site plan was constructed in accordance with Township ordinances and according to the sign permit issued at the time of construction.

 

Compliance with the general and specific special land use standards in Sec. 20.3(A) and Sec. 20.4(U) are noted on the plan.  Compliance with the special use standards are required since the special use permit for a K to 12 school is still in effect and the parking lot is an expansion of that use.

 

SUMMARY

 

a.                   A note was added that the sidewalks (which are required to be eight foot non-motorized paths along 48th Ave.) and landscaping would be constructed at the time of the construction of the building in accordance with general construction requirements.

b.                  Sec. 3.23 requires that lighting in residential districts shall be directed away from adjacent residential properties and if necessary shall be shielded to prevent the shedding of light onto adjacent residential properties or roadways.  In addition, the ZBA stipulated a condition of approval that no outdoor lighting be located within 200 feet of any property line and that all lighting, if added, be directed away from adjacent properties.  A letter stating compliance with that condition such should be submitted at the time a Zoning Compliance application is submitted to the Township prior to construction.  (No building permit is required to construct a parking lot; however, Sec. 26.4 requires that an approved Zoning Compliance Certificate be issued).

c.                   A Storm Water Drain Permit is required from the Ottawa County Drain Commission at the time an application for a Zoning Compliance is submitted to the Township (prior to construction).

 

Documentation detailing compliance with ordinance requirements.

I D number

ST0706

 

 

 

Date

6-29-07

 

 

Name

Unity Christian Schools

 

 

 

 

 

Address

5900 48th Ave.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Use

K-12 school

 

SUP required

SUP2002-obtained

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REQUIREMENT

 

 

 

 

 

PROVIDED

 Needs or Comments

Date, north arrow, scale

 

 

 

 

X

 

Name, address of preparer

 

 

 

 

X

 

Name, address of property owner or petitioner

 

 

X

 

Location sketch

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Legal description

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Size in acres of the property

 

 

 

 

X

 

Property lines and required setbacks shown and dimensioned

 

X

 

Location of existing structures, drives, parking areas within 100 ft of boundary

X

 Not showing exact building

Location and dimensions of existing and proposed structures

 

X

 

Location of existing and proposed drives (dimensions and radii), circulation

X

 

Sidewalks, non-motorized paths-select streets, accel, decel lanes

 

 

 

 

X

 a. OK to construct at time of building

Signs, exterior lighting

 

 

 

 

 

X

 b. note

Curbing, parking areas, dimensions of typical space, number of parking spaces

X

 

Calculations of parking spaces, unloading areas

 

 

 X

 

Location, pavement width, ROW of all abutting roads, easements

 

X

 

Existing zoning, and zoning and use of abutting property

 

 

X

 

Location of existing vegetation-parkway association

 

 

 

 

X

 

Location, type, size of proposed landscaping, streetscape, greenbelt

X

 

Location, height, type of existing and proposed fences and walls

 

X

 

Size, location of proposed, existing utilities, connections to water/sewer

X

 c. needs

Location, size of surface water drainage facilities

 

 

X

 

Existing, proposed topo contours, max 5 ft intervals

 

 

X

 

Rec/common areas, floodplain areas

 

 

 

X

 

Special Use Standards, general and specific

 

 

 

 X

 

Residential development extra requirements-attached garages

 

 N/A

 

 

Special Use

General Special Use Standards

A narrative was supplied in the first packet detailing compliance with the general standards.  All general and specific standards have been met and compliance is documented as follows:

            (1)        Be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance, with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such a use will not change the essential character of the area in which it is proposed.

            (2)        Be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police, fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewage facilities, or schools.

            (3)        Not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services.

            (4)        Not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, and equipment or conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors.

 

Specific Special Use Standards

(U)       K-12 Schools.

            (1)        Minimum site size for elementary schools shall be 20 acres, middle schools shall be 30 acres, and high schools shall be 40 acres.  Where a combination exists, the greater land area shall apply.  Met-79.618 acres.

            (2)        Minimum lot width of 200 ft. abutting an arterial street; and at least one means of ingress and egress shall be located on such street.  Met.

            (3)        Athletic fields shall not be located closer than two hundred (200) ft. from any property line abutting a residential zoning district.  Met.  Variances were granted.

            (4)        A greenbelt shall be provided in accordance with Sec. 3.11 where, in the opinion of the Township Board, screening is needed to minimize visual, noise, or other impacts from the proposed development.  NA.

 

Ordinance requirements for an eight-foot non-motorized path were presented, along with the Planning Commission minutes of March 15, 2000 and the Township Board minutes of March 27, 2000 when the special use permit was approved.  In addition, the Zoning Board of Appeals minutes of February 23, 2000 were presented when variances were granted from Sec. 20.4(U)(3) to permit athletic fields closer than 200 feet from any property line abutting a residential district.

 

South asked if there were enough parking places and the applicant responded that there were enough for now but more might be added when the future building is constructed.

 

The applicant noted that they were eager to get started.

 

No one was present to make comments on this topic.

 

It was noted that a Storm Water Drain Permit was already submitted from the Ottawa County Drain Commissioner’s office.

 

Moved by Poskey, seconded by Stasiak, to approve the site plan for Unity Christian Schools, 5900 48th Ave. dated 6-19-07 (dated received 6-20-07) with the following conditions:

1.                  In accordance with Sec. 26.4, a Zoning Compliance Certificate application shall be submitted to the Township and approval obtained prior to construction commencing on the parking lot.

2.                  A letter stating compliance with the variance condition regarding lighting shall be submitted at the time a Zoning Compliance application is submitted to the Township prior to construction of the additional parking lot.  The letter shall state that the lighting will be no higher than 25 feet (already noted on the plan) and the lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residential properties and if necessary shall be shielded to prevent the shedding of light onto adjacent residential properties or roadways.  In addition, the letter shall state compliance with the ZBA condition of approval that no outdoor lighting be located within 200 feet of any property line. 

3.                  An 8 foot non-motorized path in compliance with Township specifications shall be constructed adjacent to 48th Ave. at the time the school building is constructed.

4.                  Landscaping along 48th Ave. in compliance with Township ordinances shall be installed at the time the school building is constructed.

5.                  All other landscaping shown on the plan shall be installed prior to the issuance of final approval for the Zoning Compliance Certificate after the parking lot is completed.

 

MOTION CARRIED.

 

#070718-04 - Ordinance Amendments-Sec. 3.4(E)(1)

 

Sec. 3.4           ACCESSORY BUILDING AND USES. 

 (E)      Maximum Floor Area.

            (1)        The maximum floor area above grade for an attached accessory building, including garage, shall not exceed sixty (60) percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling to which it is attached, not to exceed a maximum of one thousand five hundred (1500) (1,000) sq. ft.  No attached accessory building, including garage, shall have a door opening greater than twelve (12) feet in height. 

 

The zoning administrator presented a review as follows.

 

REQUEST

 

The Planning Commission initiated the Zoning Ordinance amendment with motion # 070606-07 after much discussion and research into the topic of either eliminating or increasing the maximum size allowed for an attached garage. 

 

SUMMARY

 

The amendment would increase the maximum allowable size of an attached garage to 1500 square feet from 1000 square feet.  The additional stipulation of the maximum height of 12 feet for the door opening was to address concerns of any residents parking semi trucks and trailers in a residential garage.  The 12 foot high maximum for a door opening is consistent with the current ordinance stipulation in Sec. 3.4(G) for a detached garage.

 

The reason for the proposed amendment is to allow garage sizes to be proportionate in size with the square footage of a house.  The development trend in the Township is for some plat to have larger size homes with square footages from 2,000 to 4,000 or even 5,000 square feet.  Many of the plats with these larger sized houses (Beechgrove, Georgetown Shores, Summerset West) do not allow detached accessory buildings and the residents want areas to park additional vehicles as well as home and garden equipment.  With the amendment, a 2,500 square foot house could have an attached garage with 1500 square feet.  However, any house with an area greater than 2,500 square feet would still have to adhere to the 1,500 square foot maximum and would not be permitted to have a garage with more than 1,500 square feet.  Planning Commission members noted that the ZBA could handle situations with houses larger than 2,500 square feet when the applicant wants a larger detached garage than 1,500 square feet.

 

No one was present to speak at the public hearing.

 

Moved by Huizinga, seconded by South, to recommend to the Township Board to approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment to Sec. 3.4(E)(1) as follows to address attached garage sizes:

 

Sec. 3.4           ACCESSORY BUILDING AND USES. 

 (E)      Maximum Floor Area.

            (1)        The maximum floor area above grade for an attached accessory building, including garage, shall not exceed sixty (60) percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling to which it is attached, not to exceed a maximum of one thousand five hundred (1500) (1,000) sq. ft.  No attached accessory building, including garage, shall have a door opening greater than twelve (12) feet in height. 

 

MOTION CARRIED.

 

#070718-05 - Ordinance Amendment Chapter 24 footnote (l) (added to districts: AG, RR, LDR, LMR,

MDR, MHR, HDR)

 

Chapter 24 footnote (l) (change in the text and added to districts: AG, RR, LDR, LMR, MDR, MHR, HDR) (hold the public hearing)

 

CHAPTER 24 - SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS

 

DISTRICT

Minimum Lot Size Per Unit (a)

Maxi­mum Lot Coverage  (percent)

 

Minimum Yard Set­backs

 (b)(o)(v)

Maximum Build­ing Height (p)

 

Area

(Square Feet)

Width (Feet)

 

Front (s) (t)

Side

Rear

Stories

Feet

 

 

 

 

 

Least One

Total

 

 

 

AG Agricultur­e

40,000

200

20

40 (l)

20

40

75

35

RR Resi­den­tial

30,000 (c)

200(c)

20

40 (l)

20

40

50

35

LDR Resi­den­tial

11,475 (d)

85(n)(d)

30

40 (l)

10

20

40

35

LMR Resi­den­tial

7,700 (e)

70(n)

30

30 (l)

5

15

30

35

MDR Residential

10,000 (d)(f)

80(n)

30

35 (l)

10

20

35

35

MHR Residential (i)(j)

10,000 (e-g)

80(n)

35

35 (l)

10

20

35

35

HDR Residential (i)(j)

(e-h),(u)

---

40

30 (l)

15

30

30

35

MHP Residential (i)

----

---

35

---

---

---

---

1

20

OS Commercial

11,050

85

---

30 (l)

(m)

 

75

2

25

NS Commercial

11,050

85

---

30 (l)

(m)

 

50

35

CS Commercial

11,050

85

---

30 (l)

(m)

 

40

35

HS Commercial

15,000

100

35

30 (k)

10 (m)

25

40

35

I Industrial

40,000

150

40

45 (r)

20 (m)

40

40

3

45

 

(l)         For all uses in the residential districts and in OS, NS and CS commercial districts, except for necessary drives and walks the required front yard setback shall be landscaped and shall not be used for parking (other than for single and two-family dwellings), loading, or accessory structures.

 

The zoning administrator presented a review as follows.

REQUEST

The proposed amendment adds Footnote (l) to the following districts: AG, RR, LDR, LMR, MDR, MHR and HDR, and requires that the front yard setback in all these districts, as well as the OS, NS and CS commercial districts, shall be landscaped and not used for parking, loading or accessory structures.  Footnote (k) and (r) have similar requirements for the HS and I districts.  The amendment provides an exception for single and two-family dwellings that allows parking in the required front yard setback which would allow for visitor parking.

 

SUMMARY

The situation came to light when representatives from a church contacted the Township seeking information on setbacks and parking requirements.  At this time the Township became aware that while restrictions were in place to prevent parking in the front yard setbacks in the commercial and industrial districts, no such restrictions were in place for the residential districts. 

 

No one was present to speak at the public hearing.

 

Moved by Pearson, seconded by Huizinga, to recommend to the Township Board to approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment to Chapter 24 footnote (L) as follows to require a front yard setback to be landscaped and to prevent parking other than for single and two-family dwellings, loading and accessory structures in the front yard setback.

 

CHAPTER 24 - SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS

 

DISTRICT

Minimum Lot Size Per Unit (a)

Maxi­mum Lot Coverage  (percent)

 

Minimum Yard Set­backs

 (b)(o)(v)

Maximum Build­ing Height (p)

 

Area

(Square Feet)

Width (Feet)

 

Front (s) (t)

Side

Rear

Stories

Feet

 

 

 

 

 

Least One

Total

 

 

 

AG Agricultur­e

40,000

200

20

40 (l)

20

40

75

35

RR Resi­den­tial

30,000 (c)

200(c)

20

40 (l)

20

40

50

35

LDR Resi­den­tial

11,475 (d)

85(n)(d)

30

40 (l)

10

20

40

35

LMR Resi­den­tial

7,700 (e)

70(n)

30

30 (l)

5

15

30

35

MDR Residential

10,000 (d)(f)

80(n)

30

35 (l)

10

20

35

35

MHR Residential (i)(j)

10,000 (e-g)

80(n)

35

35 (l)

10

20

35

35

HDR Residential (i)(j)

(e-h),(u)

---

40

30 (l)

15

30

30

35

MHP Residential (i)

----

---

35

---

---

---

---

1

20

OS Commercial

11,050

85

---

30 (l)

(m)

 

75

2

25

NS Commercial

11,050

85

---

30 (l)

(m)

 

50

35

CS Commercial

11,050

85

---

30 (l)

(m)

 

40